Intelligent Predictive Decision-Making Framework for Autonomous Vehicle Navigation Using AI
Keywords:
Probabilistic Autonomous Navigation, Predictive Decision-Making Under Uncertainty, Real-Time Trajectory Planning, Latency-Constrained Navigation, Stochastic Environment Modeling, Cost-Optimized Manoeuvre Selection, Dynamic Safe-Zone Enforcement, Partial Observability Handling, Sensor Redundancy Integration, Low-Cost Inference Engines, Adaptive Horizon-Based Control, Uncertain Environment Mapping, Disrupted Neighborhood Modeling, Noise-Robust Predictive Control, Autonomous Vehicle Safety, Probabilistic Trajectory Reliability, Online Navigation Optimization, Reactive Perturbation Adaptation, Predictive Control Architectures.Abstract
Following a probabilistically-driven design philosophy, the proposed framework aims to address a pivotal aspect of real-time navigation for autonomous vehicles while constantly handling uncertainty—making predictive decisions in an uncertain environment. To this end, given a mapping of the environment augmented with statistical information for all key perturbations impacting performance during online navigation, the questions being tackled are: at each instant during online navigation (substantially constrained by latency requirements), what would be the preferred manoeuvre leading to the most favourable consequence (in terms of an appropriately defined cost function) within a defined disrupted neighbourhood of the current state? Would the definable manoeuvre, coupled with a meaningful understand of the environment at large within an horizon, guarantee that a reliable trajectory through the horizon could be sustained while dynamically adapting to key unexpected changes?
To emphasise the persistent uncertainty within real-time navigation, performance is considered within a continuously dynamically evolving local environmental neighbourhood. The objective is to remain in a safe zone—away from obstacles, poor friction and slim clearance port holes—adapting the predictive decision at the end of a navigation latency to lead reliably through the next required safe region within the horizon while still reacting towards key determined perturbations. In probabilistic terms, this framework thus focuses on a novel predictive-decision scheme capable of overcoming: a unidimensional predictive approach under noise; noise constraints within a partial-observable and dynamic environment. A novel predictive-decision system bridging a low-cost inference engine and a key sensor redundancy has exhibited the capability to reliably adapt to a few sudden—and thus not directly observable—perturbational shifts.
References
[1] Bansal, M., Krizhevsky, A., & Ogale, A. (2021). ChauffeurNet: Learning to drive by imitating the best and synthesizing the worst. arXiv, 1902.09730.
[2] Chen, C., Seff, A., Kornhauser, A., & Xiao, J. (2020). DeepDriving: Learning affordance for direct perception in autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2722–2730.
[3] Cheng, R., Agarwal, A., & Pomerleau, D. (2021). End-to-end learning of driving models from large-scale video datasets. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(2), 1165–1176.
[4] Fisac, J. F., Akametalu, A. K., Zeilinger, M. N., Kaynama, S., Gillula, J. H., & Tomlin, C. J. (2020). A general safety framework for learning-based control in uncertain robotic systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65(7), 2737–2752.
[5] Kendall, A., Hawke, J., Janz, D., et al. (2019). Learning to drive in a day. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 8248–8254.
[6] Kochenderfer, M. J., Wheeler, T. A., & Wray, K. H. (2022). Algorithms for decision making under uncertainty. MIT Press.
[7] Liu, C., Tang, J., Akin, H., & Rus, D. (2021). Robust visual navigation with reinforcement learning. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 273–280.
[8] Sallab, A. E., Abdou, M., Perot, E., & Yogamani, S. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning framework for autonomous driving. Electronic Imaging, 2017(19), 70–76.
[9] Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., et al. (2020). Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2446–2454.
[10] Wang, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., & Li, D. (2022). Model predictive control for autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(4), 2335–2354.
[11] Xu, H., Gao, Y., Yu, F., & Darrell, T. (2020). End-to-end learning of driving models with surround-view cameras and route planners. European Conference on Computer Vision, 435–453.
[12] Zhang, J., Li, W., & Ma, J. (2023). Risk-sensitive decision making for autonomous driving under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(6), 5712–5724.
[13] Zhu, Y., Mottaghi, R., Kolve, E., et al. (2017). Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 3357–3364.
[14] Paden, B., Čáp, M., Yong, S. Z., Yershov, D., & Frazzoli, E. (2016). A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 1(1), 33–55.
[15] Hussein, A., Garcia, F., Armingol, J. M., & Olaverri-Monreal, C. (2021). Deep learning architectures for autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(9), 5690–5716.
