Pulse and Protocol The Nascent Influence of AI on Care Delivery Rhythms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20442525Keywords:
Artificial intelligence in healthcare,Clinical workflow optimization,AI adoption in clinical settings,Early-stage AI implementation,Healthcare process automation,Clinical decision support systems,Machine learning in healthcare operations,Workflow efficiency improvement,AI-driven clinical productivity,Health information systems integration,Clinical operations management,Digital transformation in healthcare,Care delivery optimization,Provider workload reduction,AI impact on clinical practice.Abstract
Early artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and a weakness in organizational execution represent two elements that shape practical examples of AI-assisted clinical workflow optimization. Some institutions are realizing operational efficiencies, short-term reductions in clinical error rates, and enhanced patient experience even amid talent shortages. Initial improvements align with the actual diagnostic or treatment pathway being executed and the real-world clinical and technical capabilities enabled by the AI initiative. Data-driven medicine on the other hand, with its call for evidence-based, structured data-driven access to clinical decision support tools at the time and place of need, as well as automated alerts and reminders, remains a vision yet to be fully realized. Institutions with the right elements in place can expect workflow enhancements provided clinicians are willing and able to trust their clinical judgment more than the underlying models and embrace delegation.
While some hospitals have implemented data-mature and user-centered data-driven medicine for the first three years for diagnostic support and decision-making, AI-supported routing and triage, multispecialty treatment planning, and high-urgency multidisciplinary approval have remained aspirational. In other words, the implementation readiness of AI-supported workflow optimization in these hospitals remains in flux, with elements switching between enablers and barriers. Expectation alignment, however, has improved markedly during the same period. Work that focuses on the evolution of clinical governance, data infrastructure, training needs across clinician groups, user-centered design, and operating model readiness is therefore directly relevant to translating AI ambition into execution.
References
M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017). Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine, 15(5), 419–426.
[2] Bates, D. W., Cohen, M., Leape, L. L., Overhage, J. M., Shabot, M. M., & Sheridan, T. (2001). Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 8(4), 299–308.
[3] Blease, C., Kaptchuk, T. J., Bernstein, M. H., Mandl, K. D., Halamka, J. D., & DesRoches, C. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of primary care: Exploratory qualitative study of UK general practitioners’ views. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e12802.
[4] Carayon, P., Hoonakker, P., Hundt, A. S., & Salwei, M. E. (2020). Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model and human factors/ergonomics. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(6), 1–10.
[5] Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018). Implementing machine learning in health care—Addressing ethical challenges. The New England Journal of Medicine, 378(11), 981–983.
[6] Collins, G. S., Moons, K. G. M., Dhiman, P., Riley, R. D., & Beam, A. L. (2024). TRIPOD+AI statement: Updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ, 385, e078378.
[7] Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., & Calvert, M. J. (2020). Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The SPIRIT-AI extension. BMJ, 370, m3210.
[8] Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., & Calvert, M. J. (2020). Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The SPIRIT-AI extension. Nature Medicine, 26(9), 1351–1363.
[9] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
[10] Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2020). Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. The Lancet, 395(10227), 859.
[11] Ehteshami Bejnordi, B., Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., & the CAMELYON16 Consortium. (2017). Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA, 318(22), 2199–2210.
[12] Eysenbach, G., & the CONSORT-EHEALTH Group. (2011). CONSORT-EHEALTH: Improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e126.
[13] Fiske, A., Henningsen, P., & Buyx, A. (2019). Your robot therapist will see you now: Ethical implications of embodied artificial intelligence in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e13216.
[14] Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367.
[15] Harvey, H., Glocker, B., Bhalerao, A., & Rueckert, D. (2020). Guidance for interventional trials involving artificial intelligence: SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2(6), e200228.
[16] Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010). The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172.
[17] Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., Mauskopf, J., Mullins, C. D., Petrou, S., Peu, R.-F., Staniszewska, S., & CHEERS 2022 Task Force. (2022). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ, 376, e067975.
[18] Jones, S. S., Rudin, R. S., Perry, T., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014). Health information technology: An updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160(1), 48–54.
[19] Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 195.
[20] Khairat, S., Marc, D., Crosby, W., & Al Sanousi, A. (2018). Reasons for physicians not adopting clinical decision support systems: Critical analysis. JMIR Medical Informatics, 6(2), e24.
[21] Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J., & Denniston, A. K. (2020). Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The CONSORT-AI extension. Nature Medicine, 26(9), 1364–1374.
[22] Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J., & Denniston, A. K. (2020). Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: The CONSORT-AI extension. BMJ, 370, m3164.
[23] Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2019). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(4), 629–650.
[24] Lundberg, S. M., Nair, B., Vavilala, M. S., Horibe, M., Eisses, M. J., Adams, T., Liston, D. E., Low, D. K.-W., Newman, S.-F., Kim, J., & Lee, S.-I. (2018). Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2(10), 749–760.
[25] Mehta, N., Pandit, A., & Shukla, S. (2019). Transforming healthcare with big data analytics and artificial intelligence: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100, 103311.
[26] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.
[27] Ogrinc, G., Davies, L., Goodman, D., Batalden, P., Davidoff, F., & Stevens, D. (2016). SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Quality & Safety, 25(12), 986–992.
[28] Reddy, S., Allan, S., Coghlan, S., & Cooper, P. (2020). A governance model for the application of AI in health care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(3), 491–497.
[29] Sendak, M., D’Arcy, J., Kashyap, S., Gao, M., Nichols, M., Corey, K., Ratliff, W., & Balu, S. (2020). A path for translation of machine learning products into healthcare delivery. EMJ Innovations, 4(1), 19–26.
[30] Shortliffe, E. H., & Sepúlveda, M.-J. (2018). Clinical decision support in the era of artificial intelligence. JAMA, 320(21), 2199–2200.
[31] Sinsky, C., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., Westbrook, J., Tutty, M., & Blike, G. (2016). Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753–760.
[32] Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.
[33] Vasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., & Collins, G. S. (2022). Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. BMJ, 376, e070904.
[34] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
[35] World Health Organization. (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. World Health Organization.
[36] World Health Organization. (2023). Digital health interventions: A guide to implementation. World Health Organization.
[37] Xie, B., Saliba, D., & Zeng, Q. (2020). Designing for human-AI collaboration in healthcare: A review of human factors considerations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(19), 1–14.
[38] Yang, Q., Steinfeld, A., Rosé, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2020). Re-examining whether, why, and how human-AI interaction is uniquely difficult to design. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
